The movie Brazil sits in a time that is neither past
nor present. I think that being in a specific time (such as being clearly in
the future) would hurt the film. The film is not meant to be a prediction for
the future, it is not a prophecy of "Things to Come" (Get it? I
referenced another movie we watched). By being set in a time with a mixture of
past and present, the technology that runs throughout the movie is clearly
visible and more relatable to the audience. In a sci-fi movie, we expect the
technology to be more advanced, less intrusive, to fit with what’s around it
better. Brazil is the complete opposite: duct work crosses the rooms, the
computers are bulky and have typewriter-style keyboards, and the car looks
uncomfortably small. All this is done to draw our attention to the technology
and to emphasize how it actually, in the case of this film, makes many things
more difficult. If the movie had a clearly set date in the future, we might
look at it as more of a prediction, dismissing what is shown because we think
it is an inaccurate prediction. But by not actually being a prediction of the
future, the world in the film can be interpreted as an allegory, taken to the
extremes to better representing a universal theme.
So are you implying, because of the allegorical nature of the film, that it isn't science fiction but rather fantasy? Follow through here. Think about the theme of the film.
ReplyDelete